Date: Thu, 05 Jun 1997 13:24:20 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: David Nugent <davidn@labs.usn.blaze.net.au> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-etc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.include.dist Message-ID: <E0wZi8y-000316-00@rover.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 05 Jun 1997 17:09:40 %2B1000." <199706050709.RAA00482@labs.usn.blaze.net.au> References: <199706050709.RAA00482@labs.usn.blaze.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199706050709.RAA00482@labs.usn.blaze.net.au> David Nugent writes: : Ok. If we go this route - and I have no major objection - can we : completely detach builds in /usr/src from hardwired /usr/include and : /usr/lib? Possibly others too, like /usr/share/mk. I realise this is : more extreme than what you're saying, but if you see where I'm pointing, : it'll ultimately make it possible to build a completely different version : of the OS on any other version without the runtime dependencies in : the installed system, and it should not have any effect on the : installed system either. I'd love to see this for cross compilation purposes. It will take some doing, however. I don't think it should be required to move forward on the symlink stuff, however, that the whole tree build w/o hard wired, directly or indirectly, /usr/lib and /usr/include. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0wZi8y-000316-00>