Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 14:43:45 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?! Message-ID: <20060909184345.GA64903@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060909182831.GA32004@FS.denninger.net> References: <20060909173813.GA1388@FS.denninger.net> <200609092023.16454.max@love2party.net> <20060909182831.GA32004@FS.denninger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 01:28:31PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > Yeah, -STABLE is what you should run if you want stable code, right? >=20 > C'mon guys. This sort of thing belies a total lack of concern when chang= es > are MFC'd into production branches of the code. This kind of thing is > expected if you're running -CURRENT, but not -STABLE. >=20 > How long would it have taken to actually test the change and detect this = once=20 > it was put in? All of 30 seconds? Please try to calm down, getting angry on the mailing list is only going to make everyone else angry too. Kris --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFAwthWry0BWjoQKURApeiAJ9UGewQ41FlhgyCWc8HEYclz2ZpLgCg+Sr/ IPGxjl1NUPPDn1msHViVcUA= =uMcY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060909184345.GA64903>