Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:53:55 -0600 From: Alan Cox <alc@rice.edu> To: Ruslan Bukin <ruslan.bukin@cl.cam.ac.uk>, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Alan Cox <alc@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r308691 - in head/sys: cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs fs/tmpfs kern vm Message-ID: <149a44c1-6ab1-7598-7dc9-7698bfbfa10b@rice.edu> In-Reply-To: <20161116165939.GA12498@bsdpad.com> References: <201611151822.uAFIMoj2092581@repo.freebsd.org> <20161116133718.GA10251@bsdpad.com> <20161116165343.GX54029@kib.kiev.ua> <20161116165939.GA12498@bsdpad.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/16/2016 10:59, Ruslan Bukin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:53:43PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:37:18PM +0000, Ruslan Bukin wrote: >>> I have a panic with this on RISC-V. Any ideas ? >> How did you checked that the revision you replied to, makes the proble= m ? >> Note that the backtrace below is not reasonable. > I reverted this commit like that and rebuilt kernel: > git show 2fa36073055134deb2df39c7ca46264cfc313d77 | patch -p1 -R > > So the problem is reproducible on dual-core with 32mb mdroot. This change amounted to dead code removal, so I'm not sure how it could have an effect. There were only a couple places where the changes were other than mechanical in nature. Also, that the number of cores matters is no less puzzling. Can you send Kostik and me the output of "sysctl vm.stats.vm" from shortly after boot on the kernel with the patch reverted?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?149a44c1-6ab1-7598-7dc9-7698bfbfa10b>