Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 23:08:39 +0100 From: Nicolas Souchu <nsouch@teaser.fr> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>, Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lpt0 Message-ID: <19990214230839.45933@breizh.prism.uvsq.fr> In-Reply-To: <2747.919022328@zippy.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Sun, Feb 14, 1999 at 11:58:48AM -0800 References: <xzpemnsep4s.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <2747.919022328@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 14, 1999 at 11:58:48AM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > >> The alternative is to just update GENERIC, LINT et al to use ppbus >> instead of the old lpt driver, and throw in a warning in the probe >> messages in src/sys/i386/lpt.c telling people to move to ppbus. It >> should be pretty safe. > >Now that I could live with. Are you up for that? Not better than the actual state, since I renamed nlpt to lpt today in -current, as wished by most of you. So, we should let it as is (nlpt+lpt) in 3.1. Anyway, 3.1 is stable and what is more stable than the old-lpt? > >- Jordan > -- nsouch@teaser.fr / nsouch@freebsd.org FreeBSD - Turning PCs into workstations - http://www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990214230839.45933>