Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:29:36 -0500 (EST) From: Wes Morgan <morganw@engr.sc.edu> To: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.0 tcp weirdness Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003301727590.312-100000@volatile.by-tor.tacorp.net> In-Reply-To: <200003300259.UAA35767@prism.flugsvamp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, I would think there may be some merit in this if I didnt see a
sudden functionality return when I boot a 4.0 kernel. However, the routing
tables are functionally the same:
Routing tables in 4.0:
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
default 24.9.31.1 UGSc 17 13 ed0
24.9.31/24 link#1 UC 0 0 ed0 =>
24.9.31.1 8:0:3e:e:e9:4f UHLW 18 0 ed0 792
24.9.31.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 1 402 ed0
localhost localhost UH 3 1733 lo0
Routing tables in 5.0:
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
default 24.9.31.1 UGSc 13 0 ed0
24.9.31/24 link#1 UC 0 0 ed0 =>
24.9.31.1 8:0:3e:e:e9:4f UHLW 14 0 ed0 1169
24.9.31.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 1 1 ed0
localhost localhost UH 2 55 lo0
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> Hmm. What's your routing table look like? I was seeing some really
> weird problems like this (some connections okay, some not), when I
> had my default route set to whatever gateway that @home gave me.
> After I changed it to an interface route, the problems went away.
> --
> Jonathan
>
--
_ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___
Wesley N Morgan _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
morganw@engr.sc.edu _ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
FreeBSD: The Power To Serve _ |___/___/___/
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0003301727590.312-100000>