Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:34:47 -0800 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Neel Natu <neel@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r260898 - head/sys/kern Message-ID: <0F26E4E1-5D75-413E-B92B-AA7092B87D89@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmokgEr1THSfusi3h_3rKaQw4K=MxCOXhFWSB--Lj%2BOB6%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> References: <201401200159.s0K1xa5X012123@svn.freebsd.org> <EA6A69A5-0620-4BF9-9871-268C416D2F58@felyko.com> <1536225.gsjt6oXMt2@pippin.baldwin.cx> <CAJ-VmokgEr1THSfusi3h_3rKaQw4K=MxCOXhFWSB--Lj%2BOB6%2Bw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22 Jan 2014, at 20:05, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> wrote: > .. Make it be an offset into the table rather than a pointer, then we = can do dirty rcu style hacks to just replace and grow the table as we = need more memory. >=20 > Don't we have a standard way to pull memory from the top of the = physmem area early on for allocations like this? Perhaps a bit overkill for this problem? =20 -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0F26E4E1-5D75-413E-B92B-AA7092B87D89>