Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 22:23:52 -0400 (EDT) From: mikej@trigger.net To: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HTT on current Message-ID: <1764.63.139.119.223.1061605432.squirrel@webmail.trigger.net> In-Reply-To: <20030822230857.GA99046@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <JCEIKJMCANNPGKFKGLKLIEEGDIAA.mikej@trigger.net><XFMail.20030822170247.jhb@FreeBSD.org><1353.63.139.119.223.1061593383.squirrel@webmail.trigger.net> <20030822230857.GA99046@rot13.obsecurity.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 07:03:03PM -0400, mikej@trigger.net wrote: >> > That is not an SMP kernel. An SMP kernel (with APIC_IO) would not >> print >> > out >> > the pcib0 interrupt routing messages. >> > >> > -- >> >> So whats the problem here? > > See above. >> How come the CPUs dont show up in top. > > See above. > >> How do i realy know the system sees 2, and actually utilizes them? >> Is there anything else i have to do other than enable SMP options in >> the kernel? > > Enable *ALL* of the SMP options in the kernel. See above. > > Kris Well i've enabled all SMP options, recompiled and rebooted. The CPUs now properly show up in dmesg and i can see the C header in top. However no processes seem to be being assigned to cpu 1. Why is the schedueler only using CPU 0? This wasnt the behaviour in stable. Thanks.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1764.63.139.119.223.1061605432.squirrel>