Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:31:36 +0200 From: Ivan Radovanovic <rivanr@gmail.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Brian Somers <brian@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Deprecating ps(1)s -w switch Message-ID: <4A943C18.2050103@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A94385A.1000405@FreeBSD.org> References: <20090825034054.2d57e733@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> <4A94325D.6070201@FreeBSD.org> <4A9436A7.2020108@gmail.com> <4A94385A.1000405@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton napisa: > If you're developing your own app to display running processes > implement it any way you wish. That's totally unrelated to the > question at hand. > > Doug > I totally disagree with you - being against change means that you believe it is done the best way it could be done. Although there is another way to solve this "problem" - manual can be changed to state in the first row "process status formated for terminal output" instead of "process status" which is now title for ps. That way it would be obvious at the first look that ps is tightly coupled with terminal it is running on and nobody would need to learn this harder way. Regards, Ivan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A943C18.2050103>