Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 07:58:21 -0600 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <kdk@daleco.biz> To: <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: FreeBSD: Server or Desktop OS? Message-ID: <007501c28fd3$b9841df0$bbe2910c@DaleCoportable> References: <200211190816.gAJ8GJaq015707@grimreaper.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Murray" <mark@grondar.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD: Server or Desktop OS? > > At 11:09 AM -0600 2002/11/18, Eric Anderson wrote: > > > > Fair enough. However, at the moment, we're coming up soon on a > > dot-zero release, so we need people testing -CURRENT. > > Right. And I don't have (m)any resources to contribute to STABLE. > And, IMHAO, these 2 quotes could well represent the crux of the entire issue. It's not that no one wants to deal with -STABLE, it's that -CURRENT, with a release date of "Mid-December," is taking attention which 4 months ago (arbitrary date) would have been put into MFC'ing fixes for -STABLE, analyzing issues and PR's, etc. etc. Any chance I'm right? Any chance this'll blow over soon? Kevin Kinsey To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?007501c28fd3$b9841df0$bbe2910c>