Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 22:48:09 -0500 From: Richard Coleman <richardcoleman@mindspring.com> To: Andy Farkas <andyf@speednet.com.au> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mergemaster feature suggestion... Message-ID: <3FE66979.5070000@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <20031222132538.N97523@hewey.af.speednet.com.au> References: <20031221084531.GB31516@cactus.homeunix.org> <20031221105925.GA1713@utgard.lodz.mm.pl> <1072018131.715.10.camel@localhost> <3FE5B804.6000707@ispro.net.tr> <20031221154129.GE2228@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <3FE65CFF.2000102@mindspring.com> <20031222132538.N97523@hewey.af.speednet.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andy Farkas wrote:
> Richard Coleman wrote:
>
>>Well, regardless of what is the official method, it doesn't mean we (as
>>developers) need to make life hard for ourselves. There are a couple
>>times I would have found such a feature in mergemaster to be useful
>>(mainly as a sanity check). It's not a showstopper, just a "nice to have".
>
> I *always* use mergemaster's -v option. It does exactly what I want: tells
> me which files currently in /etc that are not part of the new install.
>
> :{ andyf@speednet.com.au
>
> Andy Farkas
> System Administrator
> Speednet Communications
> http://www.speednet.com.au/
Doh. The feature I was looking for is essentially already there. For
some reason, I didn't notice this when I read the man page. Thanks for
the pointer.
Richard Coleman
richardcoleman@mindspring.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FE66979.5070000>