Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 21:35:43 +0200 From: Jaakko Heinonen <jh@FreeBSD.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r243942 - stable/9/sbin/fsck_msdosfs Message-ID: <20121206193543.GB2182@a91-153-116-96.elisa-laajakaista.fi> In-Reply-To: <50C0CF44.6040802@mu.org> References: <201212060835.qB68ZkGe099714@svn.freebsd.org> <50C0CF44.6040802@mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012-12-06, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > I think perror writes to STDERR, printf to STDOUT. (am I wrong?) perror(3) prints on stderr. However fsck uses its own perror() (renamed to perr() in head) which prints on stdout. > You might better use warn()? Using warn(3) here wouldn't be correct. For additional details, please see the following mail: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2012-November/060990.html -- Jaakko
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121206193543.GB2182>