Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 11:04:45 -0500 From: Greg Miller <greglmiller@gmail.com> To: freebsd-hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture Message-ID: <CAHLcusTpiA5qd7o0xdQs16MdX1eOxz2aLACHACjAZhfb74Fz0Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86li92pf8k.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <CAF6rxgnYOwAPnpykTAN-Eu=oeee_uBMt1ud8U4RpyKLO5S257Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAOgwaMt2Qvt8c4YvRLJ23sqpODvb00XgwY7Czr%2BJVALXmK1wLA@mail.gmail.com> <86wqsmpmb0.fsf@ds4.des.no> <CAOgwaMtDLXydSiMUukqUV3TxXnxHURVsJu%2Bfxy94yaXwddaeMQ@mail.gmail.com> <86li92pf8k.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/1/13, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote: > You're assuming that maintaining i386 as a tier 1 platform really *does* > add significantly to our workload. Indeed. We don't seem to be running into a ton of issues on this front, and I do still find my 32-bit only Atom-based netbook useful when traveling. > You should also check your calendar :) This is one of the finest pieces of April Fools' Day trolling I've seen in quite some time. I'd rank it right up there with that press release from some years ago about Microsoft's acquisition of the Roman Catholic Church.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHLcusTpiA5qd7o0xdQs16MdX1eOxz2aLACHACjAZhfb74Fz0Q>