Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:32:42 +0500 From: "Sergey N. Voronkov" <serg@tmn.ru> To: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fwd: Vendors For WU-FTPD Please Read Message-ID: <20011121173242.A3625@sv.tech.sibitex.tmn.ru> In-Reply-To: <20011121142111.A566@straylight.oblivion.bg>; from roam@ringlet.net on Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 02:21:11PM %2B0200 References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111200951270.988-100000@ruby.ccmr.cornell. <5.1.0.14.0.20011120093740.038e2580@marble.sentex.ca> <5.1.0.14.2.20011120104126.02698ec0@netmail.home.com> <3BFA8C66.451F0835@2113.ch> <20011121103146.A2341@sv.tech.sibitex.tmn.ru> <20011121142111.A566@straylight.oblivion.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 02:21:11PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 10:31:46AM +0500, Sergey N. Voronkov wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 06:01:26PM +0100, Luc wrote: > > > Since everyone tell about its favorite FTPd, > > > here is mine: muddleftpd > > > http://www.arach.net.au/~wildfire/muddleftpd/ > > > > > > Muddleftpd is a new ftp server that can perform a variety of ftp tasks. > > > It is simple to setup, fast, secure and reasonably lightweight. > > > > I prefer lukemftpd. > > > > Pluses: > > 1) 4.4-Lite BSD based code. > > 2) Highly configurable. > > 3) Very stable. > > > > Mineses: > > 1) Hard to setup. > > 2) Extensive code maintainance (NetBSD). > > Maybe I'm missing something here, but how exactly is code maintenance > a minus? :) > Ooops! I meen s/Extensive/External/ ;-) And lukemftpd code is just a periodical "snapshot" of native NetBSD ftpd, as far as I know. (Just looking into http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/basesrc/libexec/ftpd/?cvsroot=netbsd ) I think it is a minus to this realy great ftp daemon. Best Regards, Serg N. Voronkov, Sibitex JSC. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011121173242.A3625>