Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 07:45:10 +1000 From: Felix Friedlander <felixphew0@gmail.com> To: Gour <gour@atmarama.net> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: run vs urtwn Message-ID: <BB92B63D-13E0-4602-9187-4A76AA593CBE@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <874mns4q79.fsf@atmarama.ddns.net> References: <87lhh5u928.fsf@atmarama.ddns.net> <1D4CCB1C-2D5E-467D-89B8-23ADAEF571CB@gmail.com> <8761884w9q.fsf@atmarama.ddns.net> <D85F655E-406D-44DE-B465-C04EF137788C@gmail.com> <874mns4q79.fsf@atmarama.ddns.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> <driver.tar.xz> Hmm... unusual. Try removing that last line entirely - it doesn=E2=80=99t = seem to serve any useful purpose I can see. > It sounds good and it would allow me to spare some bucks (Croatian = kunas) if > the performance would be satisfying. Performance is generally OK with NDIS drivers, the only issue is you = often miss out on features like promiscuous and monitor mode. -- Felix Friedlander <felixphew0@gmail.com>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BB92B63D-13E0-4602-9187-4A76AA593CBE>