Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 14:39:34 -0400 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "J. Mallett" <jmallett@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, will@csociety.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/stat - Imported sources Message-ID: <20020607143934.E38218@espresso.q9media.com> In-Reply-To: <20020607105234.B23604@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.org on Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 10:52:34AM -0700 References: <20020606130654.A50093@FreeBSD.ORG> <20020606134350.J4933-100000@master.gorean.org> <20020606134844.A57847@FreeBSD.ORG> <20020606214351.C38218@espresso.q9media.com> <20020607105234.B23604@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> writes: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:43:51PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > If we do intend to immediately bring something off the vendor branch, > > it is best to just cvs add it. > > No it isn't. You aren't considering that people wanting to work on our > stat(1) might want to easily refer to the NetBSD code. I do diffs from > vendor branch to our hacks all the time. What I mean is that the operation should be a `cvs add' of the vendor code, rather than a `cvs import'. Is this incorrect? Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020607143934.E38218>