Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:59:07 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Paolo Pisati <piso@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet/libalias alias_db.c alias_irc.c Message-ID: <47E1465B.9050703@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080319165522.GA95772@tin.it> References: <200803191150.m2JBoj6j020138@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080319165336.GA44656@zim.MIT.EDU> <20080319165522.GA95772@tin.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paolo Pisati wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:53:36PM -0400, David Schultz wrote:
>> By the way, is any of this security-relevant, or is there a
>> different reason why most of your recent commits have been
>> insta-MFCed? Usually things are given a chance to sit in HEAD for
>> a few days so that any problems get caught before the changes are
>> MFCed.
>
> no, but the fix was trivial so i decided to MFC immediately.
The reason we do not MFC even "trivial" fixes immediately is that
sometimes they are not so trivial. It's a good idea to wait at least 5
days to MFC something that is not critically important.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47E1465B.9050703>