Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 13:34:51 +0200 From: Ernst de Haan <znerd@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>, Marc Recht <marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de> Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG, Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> Subject: Re: 1.3.1 patchset 7 not quite ready Message-ID: <200207121334.51217.znerd@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20020710110505.GA4071@gnuppy.monkey.org> References: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FDA83A@l04.research.kpn.com> <1026297898.85611.13.camel@leeloo.intern.geht.de> <20020710110505.GA4071@gnuppy.monkey.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Bill & all,
> Also, all further HotSpot development I do will be on
> -current if folks don't know this by now. I'm open
> to suggestion for and against it.
I know, my reaction is a bit late, but anyway:
I think it's wise that you focus on HotSpot self and not on -STABLE support
just yet. Just let somebody else figure that out, it draws too much
attention and energy away from HotSpot development. If libc_r gets
backported then it should be a relatively small effort to make HotSpot
available on -stable.
Question is: Is there any chance that libc_r get backported to -stable?
Ernst
--
Ernst de Haan
EuroNet Internet B.V.
"Come to me all who are weary and burdened
and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207121334.51217.znerd>