Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 08 Jan 2001 23:10:15 -0800
From:      David Greenman <dg@root.com>
To:        Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>
Cc:        "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <jeff-ml@mountin.net>, Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com>, "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" <jeroen@vangelderen.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Intel PRO/100+ driver or hardware? 
Message-ID:  <200101090710.XAA17298@implode.root.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 08 Jan 2001 16:24:05 PST." <200101090024.f090O5K31687@earth.backplane.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>    I've had incredibly good luck with the netgear FS516 (16 port unmanaged
>    switch), more then I probably deserve.  I haven't had a single problem
>    using them to distribute our office LAN.  However, I get mixed results
>    with the smaller netgear switches (e.g. 5 and 8-port babies), and would
>    not recommend them.

   Yeah, we've been using both the 8 and 16 port Netgear switches in the
TeraSolutions offices for about a year and haven't had any problems with
them. They autonegotiate correctly with the Intel NICs and have been very
reliable.

-DG

David Greenman
Co-founder, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org
President, TeraSolutions, Inc. - http://www.terasolutions.com
Pave the road of life with opportunities.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101090710.XAA17298>