Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:36:46 -0400 From: "Mike Jakubik" <mikej@trigger.net> To: "Sheldon Hearn" <sheldonh@starjuice.net> Cc: Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: buildworld failure Message-ID: <JCEIKJMCANNPGKFKGLKLCEGIDMAA.mikej@trigger.net> In-Reply-To: <20030829154843.GO5234@starjuice.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Sheldon Hearn > Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:49 AM > To: Mike Jakubik > Cc: Current > Subject: Re: buildworld failure > > > On (2003/08/29 11:41), Mike Jakubik wrote: > > > Yes, I can see that its not working. But this is a solution to > the cause, > > not the problem. Shouldn't this be fixed? > > Depends on how much work is involved in fixing it, and what the negative > impact is of leaving it. Do you know what the impact is? I think the impact is more social. People will try to compile world and get failures. Specially people coming from the 4.x branch, where this sort of think never occurred. If this is the only thing preventing a clean makeworld with -O2, I think its worth taking a look at. I've been using freebsd since the 2.x days, I have always compiled world and ports with -O2, and never had any instability issues due to the optimizations. I have switched back to -O and -march=pentium4, the buildworld finished ok.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?JCEIKJMCANNPGKFKGLKLCEGIDMAA.mikej>