Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 11:39:12 +0100 From: Boris Staeblow <balu@dva.in-berlin.de> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CTM <> CVSUP differences Message-ID: <19990116113912.A91051@dva.in-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901152041370.558-100000@picnic.mat.net>; from Chuck Robey on Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 08:46:23PM -0500 References: <19990115150718.A66695@dva.in-berlin.de> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901152041370.558-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 08:46:23PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: > Are you using any > other tool besides ctm to touch your cvs archive? Are you doing commits > locally? No. > In terms of convenience, cvsup is supreme, but in terms of stability, > Poul's baby here is the champ, so you have to really consider other > places of corruption first. Mh, it seems that I have to double-check my environment. :-( Until now i've mounted my partitions async. Maybe it gets hosed somewhere (altought I didn't get any error messages). Yesterday I switched to soft-updates. I'll see, if it will be get better now. Boris -- balu@dva.in-berlin.de Boris Staeblow To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990116113912.A91051>