Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 21:30:35 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 217239] head (e.g.:) -r313864 arm64 vs. jemalloc without MALLOC_PRODUCTION: various examples of tbin->avail being zero lead to SIGSEGV's Message-ID: <bug-217239-8-ieQLTZVJWJ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-217239-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-217239-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217239 --- Comment #6 from Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> --- It turns out that for the script and powerd examples the whole tsd->tcache[0] through tsd->tcache[40] area (__je_nhbins==41) is all zeros. That includes the lg_fill_div members of each. For the su examples there is a next_gc_bin in tsd->tcache[2] that is non-zero: print/x tsd->tcache[2] (lldb) print/x tsd->tcache[2] (tcache_t) $1 = { link = { qre_next = 0x0000000000000000 qre_prev = 0x0000000000000000 } prof_accumbytes = 0x0000000000000000 gc_ticker = (tick = 0x00000000, nticks = 0x00000000) next_gc_bin = 0xffffffff tbins = { [0] = { tstats = (nrequests = 0x0000000000000000) low_water = 0x00000000 lg_fill_div = 0x00000000 ncached = 0x00000000 avail = 0x0000000000000000 } } } But the rest of the tsd->tcache area is zero. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-217239-8-ieQLTZVJWJ>