Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 17:35:03 +0300 From: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Add GEOM_RAID to GENERIC? Message-ID: <CAO4K=PV3dVuUWcJY2Zbokjt6FT3mSx1MPZviRZ0T0mq4Rp0UUQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201205070924.28998.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <201205070924.28998.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The only argument that stopped me is that GEOM_RAID is more active in probing for metadata then ataraid. Now it tastes all 6 formats on every provider in system. ataraid tasted only first level and subset of formats depending on controller vendor. While it is possible to do the same, I am not sure it should be done. But may be that all is not really a problem. Most users won't notice few extra requests unless something happen like disk failure, that can make boot to take much longer. 07.05.2012 16:24 пользователь "John Baldwin" <jhb@freebsd.org> написал: > > I installed 9.0 on a new desktop that used Intel's on-board RAID yesterday and > it worked great. One nit though is I had to remember to kldload geom_raid > manually from the shell before starting the install, and to load it from the > loader on the first boot after install. The old ataraid(4) was present in > GENERIC, so I think it would be fine for GEOM_RAID to be present in GENERIC > now (certainly on x86). What do you think? > > -- > John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAO4K=PV3dVuUWcJY2Zbokjt6FT3mSx1MPZviRZ0T0mq4Rp0UUQ>