Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 09:27:44 +1000 (EST) From: jason andrade <jason@rtfmconsult.com> To: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, "" <re@FreeBSD.ORG>, "" <hubs@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: 5.0-RELEASE bits for i386, pc98, sparc64, and alpha are up Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.50.0301220925190.772-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com> In-Reply-To: <20030121231807.GB38617@skriver.dk> References: <20030121231234.C7C1F2A7EA@canning.wemm.org> <20030121231400.5EAA72A7EA@canning.wemm.org> <20030121231807.GB38617@skriver.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Jesper Skriver wrote: > > > /pub/FreeBSD (core stuff) > > > /pub/FreeBSD-archive (old stuff, old releases etc) and > > > /pub/FreeBSD-extras (things like extracted source trees etc). > > > > > > Then the default expectations would be for a mirror to have /pub/FreeBSD > > > and the other stuff could be very limited and only as needed. sounds even better to me. then it becomes possible for the ftp-master to announce things like "on this day this stuff is being moved from core to archives" which lets mirrors manually move things without loosing them if they want to keep it. personally i figure the fewer things in the main tree means the more stable and up to date mirrors will be and less work for the re/pe groups. regards, -jason To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.50.0301220925190.772-100000>