Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:32:20 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Jason Tubnor <jason@tubnor.net> Cc: John Nielsen <lists@jnielsen.net>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com> Subject: Re: Where is 10.2-STABLE? Message-ID: <20160331043220.GB16330@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <CACLnyCL9wWW0uKpOKi1NdoNyc76BD6h6Ac20s6Xzps62z7W54A@mail.gmail.com> References: <64862.1459379077@server1.tristatelogic.com> <85D82290-D651-49CE-949A-8AE7FCEA8C4C@jnielsen.net> <CACLnyCL9wWW0uKpOKi1NdoNyc76BD6h6Ac20s6Xzps62z7W54A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:32:45AM +1100, Jason Tubnor wrote: > 10.3-RELEASE has been available for a few days now No, it hasn't. The bits for what _may be_ 10.3-RELEASE, barring the finding of any last-minute problems, are what is there. In at least one previous release cycle, last-minute problems *were* found, and the bits had to be re-spun. The release is not official until a signed email from the release engineering team says it's done. (I'm afraid someone has to reiterate this right at the end of every release cycle.) mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160331043220.GB16330>