Date: Sat, 11 Dec 1999 22:42:25 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: John Robert LoVerso <john@loverso.southborough.ma.us>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Modules and sysctl tree Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912112241580.26823-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <92094.944950375@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Linux have basically done this in their procfs. On Sat, 11 Dec 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > Use a similar hack: map the sysctl tree to the filesystem (ala kernfs) and > > then stat the directory nodes. > > AAIEEEEEE! sysctlfs!! :-) > > It's an interesting idea and I'm not sure why it also horrifies me at > some inner, almost cellular, level. If somebody's actually willing to > do the work of creating such a thing, however, I'll probably get over > it. :) > > - Jordan > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9912112241580.26823-100000>