Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:09:04 -0700 From: Edgar Martinez <emartinez@kbcnetworks.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: PANIC - SWBMISS (9.0-CURRENT) Message-ID: <957EB052144AA64AB39F7AB268783201022F835FD4@VA3DIAXVS881.RED001.local> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomKosb%2B32HPFbEc68WpoZj-iNfna_6m0Rr4-_B3ZkAyOw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
well, i bet lots of other locking shenanigans exist..by default.. its like whomever wrote this, never imagined that more than a single vap per interface was going to be running.. that's for sure going to affect throughput.. -----Original Message----- From: adrian.chadd@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.chadd@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Adrian Chadd Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 7:02 PM To: Edgar Martinez Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PANIC - SWBMISS (9.0-CURRENT) On 30 September 2011 09:57, Edgar Martinez <emartinez@kbcnetworks.com> wrote: > when I used your patch, it just panic'd on boot. So I took the "spirit" of your patches, and reapplied. > > Also the TDMA patch produced errors, and I left it out from mine, so I haven't tested that yet either. Whacked. I'll go off and test a little more when I next get a chance. I'm still knee deep in isolating some other race conditions (this time my doing) to get full-throughput UDP RX totally solid. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?957EB052144AA64AB39F7AB268783201022F835FD4>