Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 16:30:30 -0400 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> To: gcn53@vfemail.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with networking? Message-ID: <3EB183E6.7090008@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <1051820707.3eb182a3273f6@www.vfemail.net> References: <1051818955.3eb17bcb36c53@www.vfemail.net> <002a01c3101f$026267e0$ca0110ac@vinyl.tkvbp.com> <1051820707.3eb182a3273f6@www.vfemail.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
gcn53@vfemail.net wrote: > Quoting Kliment Andreev <klimenta@futurebit.com>: >>Send us : >> >># ifconfig -a > > fxp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 209.237.255.52 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.237.255.52 > ether 00:03:47:e7:53:ff > media: Ethernet 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> > status: active > lp0: flags=8810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > faith0: flags=8002<BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384 > ppp0: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > sl0: flags=c010<POINTOPOINT,LINK2,MULTICAST> mtu 552 That netmask looks pretty wrong. Something like ffffff00 sounds more reasonable, although I can't be sure whether that's right either. I can think of a very limited number of cases where the primary IP on an ethernet card should have the netmask you have. Verify it. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EB183E6.7090008>