Date: Tue, 8 Aug 1995 08:11:43 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: odiug@darkstar.informatik.rwth-aachen.de, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/660: /bin/sh has problem with redirection. Message-ID: <199508080611.IAA05743@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199508080337.NAA21696@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Aug 8, 95 01:37:55 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Bruce Evans wrote: > > >... The pdksh also seems a lot smaller: > >-rwxr-xr-x 1 bin bin 217088 Jul 4 22:38 ksh > >lrwxr-xr-x 1 bin bin 3 Aug 8 01:16 sh -> ksh > >-r-xr-xr-x 1 bin bin 299008 Jun 10 11:48 sh.old > > The difference is mostly for the 63K libedit.a that gives support for both > vi and emacs mode line editing. Isn't (pd)ksh also supposed to have command-line editing? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508080611.IAA05743>