Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:21:17 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        craigs@os.com (Craig Shrimpton)
Cc:        terry@lambert.org, jab@rock.anchorage.net, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Slow Etherlink
Message-ID:  <199609171721.KAA04369@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9609162301.A31013-0100000@solar.os.com> from "Craig Shrimpton" at Sep 16, 96 11:33:07 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > It means it can't transmit and receive at the same time.  This is a card
> > "feature", and if you haven't seen it before, your other OS has been
> > lying to you (or it's one of the drivers that needs updated).
> > 
> > In general, SIMPLEX, if capable of being fixed via a driver interface
> > (usually it is not, as noted above), will only affect unidirectional
> > throughput, generally out of the machine, and generally only for real
> > data transferred (ie: it's not your "ping" problem, whatever your "ping"
> > 
> 
> 
> What cards are "synchronous?"  I use SMC EtherPower PCI cards (de0) 
> because they are basically plug and play under FreeBSD.  I put 3 in a 
> FBSD router box and they all worked first try automagically!
> 
> Any idea if the SMC drivers are updateable?

The drivers are *always* updtatable.

However, if the card simply does not have enough memory on board to
hold both an inbound and an outbound buffer simultaneously, it *must*
remain "simplex" no matter who writes the driver or how well.

Just because other OS's don't report the fact doesn't make it any less
a fact.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609171721.KAA04369>