Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 16:26:29 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@bitbox.follo.net> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG, ahasty@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci brktree_reg.h brooktree848.c Message-ID: <19971031162629.52794@bitbox.follo.net> In-Reply-To: <199710311455.WAA24525@spinner.netplex.com.au>; from Peter Wemm on Fri, Oct 31, 1997 at 10:55:36PM %2B0800 References: <19971031153140.46733@bitbox.follo.net> <199710311455.WAA24525@spinner.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 31, 1997 at 10:55:36PM +0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > Eivind Eklund wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 31, 1997 at 08:56:53PM +0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > > > Eivind Eklund wrote: > > > > eivind 1997/10/30 10:20:27 PST > > > > > > > > Modified files: > > > > sys/pci brktree_reg.h brooktree848.c > > > > Log: > > > > Improve PAL support and fix mux selector values. > > > > > > > > This make the Miro PCTV work for me, including audio, and should > > > > hopefully fix the other audio problems some people have been having. > > > > > > > > Reviewed by: ahasty & Luigi Rizzo (freebsd-multimedia) > > > > > > > > Revision Changes Path > > > > 1.9 +6 -1 src/sys/pci/brktree_reg.h > > > > 1.17 +98 -31 src/sys/pci/brooktree848.c > > > > > > Who is the 'vendor'? > > > > eivind@freebsd.org :-) > > > > > Shouldn't this have been imported and merged? > > > > My understanding with Amancio was that this was now considered to be > > maintained in the FreeBSD tree only - in that case, it should just be > > committed, shouldn't it? > > Does he give you a diff to commit, or a set of new files? That's the main > difference between stuff that should be patched and committed versus > imported and merged. I didn't get this from him - I wrote it myself, so it came at about 30bps from my keyboard, as some form of diff against the old code, sure ;-) He just urged me to commit it, and didn't release a new version himself - it seemed that he considered it to be maintained in the FreeBSD tree, and the separate distribution was dropped (or was going to be made from the stuff in the tree, not the other way around). I've included him in the Cc: line, so he can say more about the state of this himself. Eivind.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971031162629.52794>