Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:23:04 -0500 From: Bill Vermillion <bv@wjv.com> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Router based on FreeBSD. Message-ID: <20011211102304.C81658@wjv.com> In-Reply-To: <3C161C1F.8080601@quake.com.au>; from kaltorak@quake.com.au on Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 01:45:51AM %2B1100 References: <CA28026327658B478F964AD08A46D4130560CB@exch2k.stack.firm> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0112110400040.14453-100000@workhorse.iMach.com> <20011211083420.A80896@wjv.com> <3C161C1F.8080601@quake.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 01:45:51AM +1100, Kal Torak thus spoke: > Bill Vermillion wrote: > > >>Personally I'd switch all the cards out for Intel, but that is my > >>preference - and I can't say it would help at all. > > I prefer them too. However I wonder just what model numbers > > the above 3com cards are. Model number might have a bearing on > > this. > Hes using a 3com 3300 XM switch, so its probably best to stick > withe the 3com cards as well... Things made by the same company > usualy work best together :) That may be true in some areas but shouldn't be true in TCP/IP and/or ethernet functions. I've run so many different routers, switches, etc that most probalby weren't being made by the same. I was more wondering about the cards and the rev's on the cards as some models don't works as well as other models from the same company. The first iNTEL NIC's were a bit weird for some OSes and the B model was the one to get. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011211102304.C81658>