Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 04:05:26 +0000 From: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" <stephen@missouri.edu> To: Yasuhito KAMINAGA <kaminaga@nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp>, "ctm-users@freebsd.org" <ctm-users@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Do you still need CTM? Message-ID: <55D40085.4010907@missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <20150819.122822.193714783.kaminaga@nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp> References: <55D3E582.2030908@missouri.edu> <20150819.122822.193714783.kaminaga@nat.gunma-ct.ac.jp>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 08/18/2015 10:28 PM, Yasuhito KAMINAGA wrote: > I need ctm at preesnt because our firewall > is extremely restrictive and it has been > prevented all protocols related to updating > freebsd. I must confess that I do not try > recent protocols for long times (ten years > or so). Thus, the situation may be changed > now. But ctm is undoubtedly a final method. > I hope it be continued as an insurance. > > Can you try to see if you can get svn to work? Another approach is that people could have a repository of svn at home, and then create deltas at home, and bring that to work, either by emailing it to themselves, or by taking it in on a flash drive. This can be achieved purely by using svnadmin dump (to create the deltas) and svnadmin load (to apply the deltas). The current mkCTM and ctm commands are merely wrappers to these commands when they handle svn-cur. (Most of the overhead is packaging it into the CTM structure, creating checksums, and compressing the data.) If this last approach is viable, I could provide a few more details of how to do this - maybe write some simple script.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55D40085.4010907>