Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:01:57 +0000 From: "Florent Thoumie" <flz@xbsd.org> To: "Benjamin Lutz" <mail@maxlor.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/113132 (make -j patch) Message-ID: <a01628140803120601w49848718hc6ea6208f2b21692@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200803121311.51383.mail@maxlor.com> References: <200803121311.51383.mail@maxlor.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Benjamin Lutz <mail@maxlor.com> wrote: > This patch has been sitting in GNATS for a couple of months now: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/113132 > > I've received a few mails from people reporting success, and none > reporting that bad things have happened. Is it possible to get this > committed? It needs to go through an experimental build first. IMHO, this is an ugly hack. Ultimately, we're talking about marking almost 20k ports as parallel-safe. Why not taking the opposite approach? Allow it by default, figure out which ports break and why, fix where possible? -- Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a01628140803120601w49848718hc6ea6208f2b21692>