Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 15 Apr 2006 01:06:01 GMT
From:      John Birrell <jb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Subject:   PERFORCE change 95296 for review
Message-ID:  <200604150106.k3F1615m068235@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=95296

Change 95296 by jb@jb_freebsd2 on 2006/04/15 01:05:31

	Sun's DTrace implementation is written using their procfs and libproc.
	Let's not go that way. We may end up with a libproc for DTrace use, but
	it won't be implemented using procfs.

Affected files ...

.. //depot/projects/dtrace/src/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libproc/common/libproc.h#3 delete

Differences ...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200604150106.k3F1615m068235>