Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:50:59 +0100 From: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>, "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@freebsd.org>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org, imp@freebsd.org, Iang <iang@iang.org> Subject: Re: strange limitation on rcmd() Message-ID: <20060710175059.GA2325@uk.tiscali.com> In-Reply-To: <200607101147.34530@aldan> References: <200607072030.01999.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <44B25F0A.5040709@iang.org> <20060710141729.GF1101@zaphod.nitro.dk> <200607101147.34530@aldan>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 11:47:33AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > What I remain upset about, though, is that the rcmdsh(), which is used by > rcmd() ignores the fd2p parameter making it impossible to capture the > remote's stderr... Well, it's probably worth send-pr'ing it. I'd first test whether rsh itself forwards stderr properly. Maybe there's some underlying reason why rcmdsh doesn't have an fd2p argument.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060710175059.GA2325>