Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 06:29:44 +0000 (GMT) From: Adam David <adam@veda.is> To: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP! Please check... Message-ID: <199603110629.GAA16424@veda.is> In-Reply-To: <199603110558.HAA01535@grumble.grondar.za> from Mark Murray at "Mar 11, 96 07:58:39 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > ubiq [1] % su > > su: kerberos: not in root's ACL. > > ubiq [2] % > > > > It used to prompt for a normal password and work. This is for all su to group > 0. > > Okay, kerberos is installed but not configured... but shouldn't this work? > > No. tell it not to use kerberos with `su -K'. Yes, I have been doing that. It was just a surprise to see the change in this behaviour for the case without the -K. I would expect it to ask for a normal password when kerberos is present but not available (for whatever reason). Or is this considered a security feature, to require non-kerberos handling to be explicitly requested?... but in that case why did the previous version ask for the password twice at all? -- Adam David <adam@veda.is>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603110629.GAA16424>