Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:09:42 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabextract Makefile ports/archivers/dact Makefile ports/archivers/starMakefile Message-ID: <200504122009.46859.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0504121221150.30410-100000@pancho> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0504121221150.30410-100000@pancho>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tuesday, 12. April 2005 19:21, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, David O'Brien wrote: > > Maybe only dealt with a small number of them... What I was trying to do > > is fix the MACHINE_ARCH knob posters to freebsd-amd64 keep changing > > trying to get ports to build on AMD64. Fixing everything, is most likely > > a multi-step fix. > > This sounds like a good case for running these patches through a > regression test on the ports build cluster. And discussing them beforehand. I would *really* like to get a clarification on the issue of MACHINE_ARCH vs ARCH usage for the build-target string, does nobody know? -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCXA7qXhc68WspdLARAjP9AJ91W73ogmBWkubgD5fxpk6HaoMLTgCfYMiH adIpEJCQ1aMd5IKzg1akYB8= =gLtA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200504122009.46859.michaelnottebrock>