Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 12:52:50 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Akinori MUSHA <knu@iDaemons.org> Cc: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/postfix Makefile ports/mail/postfix/files patch-aj Message-ID: <20010914125250.B3913@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <86k7z230rg.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>; from knu@iDaemons.org on Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:32:51PM %2B0900 References: <200109140322.f8E3M8O68957@freefall.freebsd.org> <86k7z230rg.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:32:51PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote: > At Thu, 13 Sep 2001 20:22:08 -0700 (PDT), > David W. Chapman Jr. <dwcjr@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > dwcjr 2001/09/13 20:22:08 PDT > > > > Modified files: > > mail/postfix Makefile > > mail/postfix/files patch-aj > > Log: > > Fix path on main.cf in reference to prefix > > Bump PORTREVISION > > > > PR: 30547 > > Submitted by: hanahara@meiko.co.jp > > I don't think you needed to bump PORTREVISION, since it was just a > typo rather than a bug, and it doesn't require the users to upgrade > the port if they configure postfix correctly. > > Besides, that line doesn't affect anything at all, it seems. :) Please don't bump the PORTREVISION unnecessarily. Every bump suggests to thousands of users that they need to upgrade. That's a lot of wasted man-hours if it's not necessary. Thanks, Joe [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjuh75IACgkQXVIcjOaxUBZOxwCbBnQZFCer4nyJ7hfjahZ3h7Gf x+0Ani8sVUhLckGp+U5LYBTClYv2XLXB =HTB6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010914125250.B3913>