Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:32:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Laszlo Danielisz <laszlo.danielisz@yahoo.com> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: How to run a server at normal priority? Message-ID: <303350581.168208.1418812344298.JavaMail.yahoo@jws106144.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <54906D97.4090304@gmail.com> References: <54906D97.4090304@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
That is what I wanted to say, be carefully when you change the priority of = a process, they have that specific priority for a reason. Though, if you really want you my use renice:https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ma= n.cgi?query=3Drenice&sektion=3D8 renice command: Change the Priority of a Already Running Process =C2=A0=20 On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:36 PM, Noel <noeldude@gmail.com> wrote= : =20 On 12/16/2014 11:13 AM, Unga via freebsd-questions wrote: > Hi all > I have FreeBSD 9.0 on a i386 hardware. > I have few server daemons run on this machine, all runs at normal priorit= y (20) except one at priority (52). > All server daemons run as their respective user ID. How to run this low p= riority server at normal priority as others? > Many thanks in advance. > Best regardsUnga=20 The developer chose that priority intentionally when they wrote the program.=C2=A0 Consider carefully before you change it. man renice =C2=A0 -- Noel Jones _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 11:15:06 2014 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 299B71926; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DF3181D; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sBH9bEaQ014203; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:37:14 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <54914ECA.9040300@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:37:14 +0000 From: Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, security-officer@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update and boot environments clash - rm / attempted! References: <54914CCC.7080102@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: <54914CCC.7080102@qeng-ho.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:15:06 -0000 On 17/12/2014 09:28, Arthur Chance wrote: > I just updated my systems to deal with the latest security bulletin. On > the machines where I'm running zfs based boot environments I got the > somewhat worrying: A correction. It's not machines using boot environments, it's machines running 10.1-REL. (Most of my 10.1 boxes use b.e., the one that doesn't is very small and slow, so took a while to update.) The problem did not manifest on my one 10.0-REL box. -- Those who do not learn from computing history are doomed to GOTO 1
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?303350581.168208.1418812344298.JavaMail.yahoo>