Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:11:54 -0500 From: Mike B <meb@cinci.rr.com> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: problem with ld-elf.so.1 install Message-ID: <4035188A.3070600@cinci.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <20040219195315.GA33224@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20040216014850.GA866@panzer.kdm.org> <4034AAFC.4000502@cinci.rr.com> <20040219092610.A49765@carver.gumbysoft.com> <40350EC8.9050900@cinci.rr.com> <20040219195315.GA33224@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Steve Kargl wrote: >On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 02:30:16PM -0500, Mike B wrote: > > >>I didn't change anything explicitly related to it but I could have >>inadvertently messed it up. It is strange though that I would be able to >>recompile the programs with no problem while the existing ones would >>produce this error. Was there some change of libstdc++ between 5.2.1RC2 >>and -CURRENT? I'm wary of moving back to -CURRENT because of this >>(OpenOffice is > 8 hrs to compile and I depend on it day to day). Thanks >>for your observations. >> >>Mike >> >>Doug White wrote: >> >> >> >>>Did you mess up libstdc++? Those symbols come out of there. >>> >>> >>> > >Please don't top-post. You lose context that way. > >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libc/stdlib/atexit. > Thank you for the link. I'll be more mindful of the format of my posts. Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4035188A.3070600>