Date: Mon, 7 Oct 1996 21:26:07 +0400 (MSD) From: "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" (Andrey A. Chernov) <ache@nagual.ru> To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Cc: terry@lambert.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: I plan to change random() for -current (was Re: rand() and random()) Message-ID: <199610071726.VAA01295@nagual.ru> In-Reply-To: <l03010501ae7e7bef91e4@[208.2.87.4]> from "Richard Wackerbarth" at "Oct 7, 96 04:28:30 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> If YOU want a different function, by all means write one, test it, and use it. > > However, DO NOT change the existing functions. PERIOD. The function must conforms standard - it is main rule. What you say is "golden code" syndrome. We already change some math functions and nobody complains. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nagual.ru> http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610071726.VAA01295>