Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 13:09:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@misha.cisco.com> Cc: peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm), current@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files) Message-ID: <199904212009.NAA08036@apollo.backplane.com> References: <199904211751.NAA31922@misha.cisco.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:Speaking of, when can we expect to see this wonderfull _stability_
:improvement in -stable? I'm setting up a server here, and would
:rather have fixed NFS code in it... Yet, jumping to -current is
:officially wrong... Thanks!
:
: -mi
Well, you already see a lot of the pure bug fixes being backported.
What you don't see in -stable are the bug fixes that also depend on the
rewritten portions of the system, nor do you see the rewritten portions
of the system themselves. The latest NFS patch is borderline -- it
would be possible to backport in time enough for the 3.2 deadline, but
it wouldn't be fun.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904212009.NAA08036>