Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 16:40:42 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: ler@lerctr.org Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Confusing message(4.8-RC) Message-ID: <20030329.164042.94336976.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <269400000.1048711273@lerlaptop.iadfw.net> References: <269400000.1048711273@lerlaptop.iadfw.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <269400000.1048711273@lerlaptop.iadfw.net>
Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
: Is there a reason why the uplcom driver puts out the following when the
: /dev node is ucom?
Because device name != driver name. It should actually report that
ucom attached at uplcom, in a NEWBUSly correct world, but doesn't
right now. I think due ot sharing a lot of code with NetBSD.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030329.164042.94336976.imp>