Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 15:08:26 -0700 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include stddef.h Message-ID: <20010526220826.7CE6238CB@overcee.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20010525023459.E7406@casimir.physics.purdue.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Will Andrews wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 09:51:10AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > How that could be? Don't we count the '$FreeBSD$' line? > > Not necessarily. Only when the previous commit that was made was made > w/o the rcsid expanded. I've made several "+0 -0" commits before. :-) If the previous commit had the tag changed to "$FreeBSD$" and the current commit had it as "$FreeBSD$" then you get this. The tags are expanded on *checkout*, not checkin. If you have: "$FreeBSD: is excellent $" then that is what actually goes into the rcs files. I have contemplated in the past making the commit checkin scripts change any expanded $FreeBSD: foo $ tags into plain $FreeBSD$ so that it doesn't keep occupying rcs delta space, but I was concerned about potential interactions with remote commits and the 'touched but not actually modified' checking. It would be worth experimenting with I think. It is silly that we have +1 -1 on most commits solely because of the header changes. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010526220826.7CE6238CB>