Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:06:22 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern init_sysent.c syscalls.c src/sys/sys syscall.h syscall.mk sysproto.h Message-ID: <20020201100622.L18604@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <200202011741.g11HfjB42378@freefall.freebsd.org>; from bde@FreeBSD.org on Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:41:45AM -0800 References: <200202011741.g11HfjB42378@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org> [020201 09:41] wrote: > bde 2002/02/01 09:41:45 PST > > Modified files: > sys/kern init_sysent.c syscalls.c > sys/sys syscall.h syscall.mk sysproto.h > Log: > Regenerate to make osigreturn standard. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.114 +2 -2 src/sys/kern/init_sysent.c > 1.101 +2 -2 src/sys/kern/syscalls.c > 1.99 +2 -2 src/sys/sys/syscall.h > 1.54 +2 -1 src/sys/sys/syscall.mk > 1.90 +5 -5 src/sys/sys/sysproto.h Do you have any input as to whether per-arch syscall.master is a good idea? Or perhaps syscall.std, or something that specifies which arches have which syscalls? Specifically so that we could make osigreturn an i386 only syscall? -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductable donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020201100622.L18604>