Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:59:09 +0100 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Matthew Fleming <mdf@FreeBSD.org>, "src-committers@FreeBSD.org" <src-committers@FreeBSD.org>, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>, "svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org" <svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>, "svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org" <svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r253802 - head/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Headers Message-ID: <32EA01FA-4E66-4764-9928-E1435ADEAE1C@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201308140821.50565.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <201307301233.r6UCXLT8012177@svn.freebsd.org> <20130813205736.GA68244@stack.nl> <2A4F32C7-939D-4C4D-A136-D99FC06C486E@FreeBSD.org> <201308140821.50565.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 Aug 2013, at 13:21, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 4:23:11 am David Chisnall wrote: >> On 13 Aug 2013, at 21:57, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> wrote: >> >>> Given that JIT is for performance and larger addresses increase code >>> size and register pressure, the mmap() flag is probably useful. >>> Alternatively, all the JITted code could be placed in one block and use >>> relative addressing. >> >> This would be a good thing to have in for 10.0, as the LLVM 3.4 JIT will >> require it unless someone wants to contribute support for the large code >> model... > > So you just need a flag to cap the virtual address at 2GB? Do you think we > need an arbitrary address flag for this, or is a hardcoded 2GB flag ok? > > Linux has a MAP_32BIT that does what you want I think. Yes, MAP_32BIT is used on Linux to solve this. David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?32EA01FA-4E66-4764-9928-E1435ADEAE1C>