Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 11:58:33 +0300 (EEST) From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@mail-in.net> To: mwm@mired.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WITHOUT_X vs. WITHOUT_X11 vs. NO_X Message-ID: <200106020858.f528wRo50215@mail.uic-in.net> In-Reply-To: <15128.35153.820695.616260@guru.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001 01:36:01 -0500, Mike Meyer wrote: > Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@mail-in.net> types: > > At the same time, we have X11BASE, so little consistency > > certainly won't hurt. > > A little consistency hurts when it causes a lot of inconsistency. Most > of the variables in /etc don't have version numbers. For ports, > WITHOUT_GTK, WITHOUT_GLIB, WITHOUT_IMLIB, and WITHOUT_GNOME don't have > version numbers, and those are the ones most similar to this in > functionality. > > WITHOUT_X is the one that was documented after it was discussed on > -dco. It's the one users will expect to work. -doc desn't have any authority over -ports issues. This question was discusses some time ago and consensus reached about WITHOUT_X11. Documentation should follow architecture desisions, not otherwise. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200106020858.f528wRo50215>