Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 17:25:47 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Phoenix <dphoenix@bravenet.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: Jos Backus <josb@cncdsl.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: qmail IO problems Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.21.0102051724590.18264-100000@gandalf.bravenet.com> In-Reply-To: <20010205165023.L26076@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I should also state ps awwlx|wc -l or whatever returned approx 90 processes. So don;t think that is an issue here. On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 16:50:23 -0800 > From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> > To: Jos Backus <josb@cncdsl.com> > Cc: Dan Phoenix <dphoenix@bravenet.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: qmail IO problems > > * Jos Backus <josb@cncdsl.com> [010205 16:30] wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 02:11:38PM -0800, Dan Phoenix wrote: > > > their mail message is taken and piped to...sendmail -t > > > which is a symbolic link to /var/qmail/bin/sendmail -t > > > > You can save an exec by piping directly into qmail-inject, which should have > > the same effect (qmail's sendmail execv's qmail-inject; it sounds like you > > don't need the compatibility interface). > > You could also do some tricky stuff if qmail has a constant reading > scheme by using some sort of FIFO and a file that you fcntl lock > over. > > You could have a simple perl script listening on the other end of > the perl script and dole out email to several persistant processes. > > -- > -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] > "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSO.4.21.0102051724590.18264-100000>