Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:38:49 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: RFC: Add a RUN_DEPENDS on gm4 for bison
Message-ID:  <20021115233849.GA18035@rot13.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <1037376470.313.9.camel@gyros>
References:  <1037376470.313.9.camel@gyros>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:07:50AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> I'm seeing quite a few ports fail on bento because gm4 is not present
> for bison.  I'm wondering if instead of adding a BUILD_DEPENDS on gm4
> for all those ports, if I shouldn't just make gm4 a RUN_DEPENDS for
> bison. Thoughts?

Sounds like the right thing to do.

Kris

--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE91YWJWry0BWjoQKURAizXAJ4kkKQP99O/br0nDZC8xMc8JnTBZwCg9Ax3
JPzGugNOyY/KGRP9a72MVWc=
=FLmz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021115233849.GA18035>