Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 06:27:33 -0700 From: pete wright <nomadlogic@gmail.com> To: Hexren <me@hexren.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: 2 Network Cards & 2 IP's? Message-ID: <57d710000410270627188b4120@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <432307798.20041027075440@hexren.net> References: <20041026162657.B873943D5D@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <1098825225.4101.17.camel@aaron.proficuous.com> <11516587842.20041026232016@hexren.net> <200410262030.49276.josh@tcbug.org> <432307798.20041027075440@hexren.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:54:40 +0200, Hexren <me@hexren.net> wrote: > > JP> On Tuesday 26 October 2004 21:20, Hexren wrote: > >> >> For example: > >> >> > >> >> 192.168.1.100 on NIC 1 > >> >> > >> >> 192.168.1.101 on NIC 2 > >> >> > >> >> Gateway 192.168.1.1 > >> > >> ---------------------------------- > >> > >> Am I seeing the wrong problem when I say that: > >> > >> #ifconfig NIC1 192.168.1.100 > >> #ifconfig NIC1 192.168.1.101 > >> #route add default 192.168.1.1 > >> > >> should do what you want ? > >> > >> Hexren > > JP> You can't put two NICs w/ the same subnet into a FBSD machine > > --------------------------------------------- > > I can't challenge that I never tried but it should surprise me if that > was true. What error message does the system give if you try to do > that ? > as per previous posts in this thread. basicly you get warning messages in your logs like so: > xl0 > arp: 192.168.1.100 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:02:b3:9f:74:89 on > xl0 > arp: 192.168.1.1 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:07:e9:10:43:78 on which can be diabled: net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_wrong_iface: 1 i belive, don't have a box to check the sysctl with right now.... -p -- ~~o0OO0o~~ Pete Wright www.nycbug.org NYC's *BSD User Group
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57d710000410270627188b4120>